anita līcis-ribak’s blog

architecture art photography music culture travel

14
Apr 2010

Making men (and women) of our dreams

Remarkable work from a young Russian photographer Alexander Gronsky!  I love his series of photographs of cities and people at dusk from the borderlines of civilization, such as Endless Night and Chukotka Travel, both under Editorial, and his ephemeral Edges series, found under Artwork.  But the collection that struck me most was Town of Brides (Editorial).  

 
"With 1298 women for every 1000 men Novgorod is now officially called "Town of Brides".  For this project women seeking marriage were asked to produce with help of police software portrait (sic) of a man of their dreams" - says Gronsky in his intro to the series.    
 
Photographs of Novgorod women are coupled with the engineered portraits of their dream men.  Women, all of them good looking, are shown in what appears to be their natural surroundings.  There are no theatrics, no drama.  But you sense a quietly felt static of unsatisfied yearning.  What struck me most were the composite physiognomies of their imaginary men.   All of them were nothing short of highly undesirable, to me (since I had to go through this exercise of looking and 'evaluating' them as dream material).  These would be the men I would caution my daughter against (if I had one).  But then, I don't live in Novgorod.  Is it desperation felt by these women, coupled with their low self-esteem, that we see at work here?  Is it our tendency to repeat our history, even if it is a violent and demoralizing one?  I say this because I am well aware of the difficulties these women may be facing, being exposed to domestic violence, alcoholism, harassment, lack of opportunities, apathy, and loneliness, all byproducts of a broken empire, and of a loaded - and very immediate - history.  What a poignant - and timely - portrait of imaginary anti-couples, by Alexander Gronsky!  
 
An old Latvian adage says "Neskaties vīru pēc cepures", which loosely translates as "don't choose a man from his hat (meaning his looks)".  Other cultures encourage women to give a man's shoes an inspecting gaze, to see how well upkept they are, as an indicator of just how good a husband he would make.  In yet other places, you are advised to get drunk with your sweetheart, to have a sneak peak into his true nature, before you commit to nuptials.  None of the men in the drawings has a hat, but they all have a distinctly unsettling look!  I think I would skip the hat, ignore the shoes, and run away from any co-drinking offers altogether! 
Alexander Gronsky.  Town of Brides series.  2010
 
A different kind of couple, living on the opposite side of the globe, is presented in the London-based photographer Zed Nelson's brilliant and disturbingly acute series Love Me.  A man, a modern-day Pygmalion in full control of his fate, proud of his workmanship, with a woman of his dreams - and a fruit of his labor - by his side.  She is his Galatea, his creation, and his sunbathed version of Botticelli's Venus, his Muse -  all in one. 
Zed Nelson.  Ox and Angela, plastic surgeon and wife. 2010
Rio, Brazil.
 
Two couples.  One imaginary.  Another one real.  Both products of fear, imagination, vanity and longing.  Both joined by their surreal premise, and an uncertain future.  
  
File:Botticelli Venus.jpg
Sandro Botticelli.  The Birth of Venus.  1486
Image source: commons/wikimedia.org
Jean Léon Gerôme.  Pygmalion and Galatea.  1865-70. 
Image source: www.victorianweb.org

10
Apr 2010

Every day, between yesterday and tomorrow - 5

(or the Captive in Captivity)

These recent photos of spiderwebs I took in Hadley make me think of Erte's delicate costume drawings with their long strings of pearl and stone.  I wonder if he got to walk the country fields on early foggy mornings, once he became the fashion king or Paris.  But his designs seem to be inspired not only by the visions of far-away exotic lands (no, the rural US wouldn't be one of them), and by the tastes of his highly sophisticated Parisian clientele, but also by these kinds of ephemeral patterns found in nature.  
Erte's Design Images:
Pearls.  Media : Graphic Edition, Embossed Serigraph 
Queen of the Night.  Media : Graphic Edition, Embossed Serigraph with Foil Stamping 
Embossed serigraph with foil stamping.  July 1990, 35" x 56", Chromacomp, New York
Costume designs for the Diamond in Les Pierres Précieuses, Folies-Bergère, Paris, 1923 and Irving Berlin's Music Box Revue, New York, 1924, Gouache, 14 x 10-1/2 inches
Erte's image source: http://erte.ru and http://www.erte.com

             

Filed under  //   art   costume design   Erte   nature   Paris  
10
Apr 2010

Every day, between yesterday and tomorrow - 4

What do you think of, when you think of BLACK? 

New York
depression 
Solange 
caviar
Louise Nevelson 
death
Coco Chanel 
polar night 
Mark Rothko 
computer monitor that won't work
Albert Einstein
black and white photography
Malevich
polar night 
Mr.Bean (as in Black Adder)
what else?......
none of the above? 

How about color?  And what about light??

"I didn't start using pure black paint to show darkness.  I started using it to show light", said Henri Matisse in 1914.

As a teenager studying painting in the Russian Arctic I was taught by my teacher Maria Vlasovna (whose last name has been long betraying my memory) to never ever use BLACK in my work.  We were at the time working on a series of still lives, or 'натюрмортр's.  Russians, for their love of everything French, that goes back centuries, use the French 'nature morte' which literally means still, or frozen nature, or life.  (As if you could freeze life!  Oh, but wait, yes, you can!...)  Our 'frozen lives' were usually artful, if a bit contorted, assemblies of artificial fruits, vases, draperies, architectural fragments and other art paraphernalia that were lit by bare bulbs screaming 'October revolution'.  A sad yellow light was artfully sinisterized by an audio accompaniment in the form of wailing songs of the arctic winds outside small frozen windows, 4 panes thick.  While we indulged in our pursuit of mastering the intricacies of high arts, armies of ignorant cockroaches were busy encroaching on the fruits of our labor, stored in the shelves in the corner of the same room.  Always unbeknownst to us, they would feast on the sweeter of the pigments, leaving long nervously irregular lines on the surface of our watercolor paintings.  And they would always be gone (to an afterparty elsewhere, perhaps?), before we could ever get to them.  If you think you are seeing pure black, which you are not, use other colors to make it, was one of Maria Vlasovna's mantras.  Maybe that's why each class was 3 hours long.  Try concocting your own black!  

Years later I found out that while my classmates and I were struggling, sheepishly inventing our BLACKS, other, much shrewder - and real - painters in other parts of the world, would just go right ahead and use the black right out of their tubes.  (I don't know about Malevich, but think of Solange, and of Louise Nevelson for instance)  Cheaters, I thought!  But I guess, there's right time, right place - and the right color - for everything! 

On a recent trip to Washington D.C., I had a couple of hours to spare before leaving the city.  So I headed to the National Gallery of Art.  There were two shows there that I wanted to see in particular.  One of them was 'In the Tower: Mark Rothko'.   It was housed above the rest of the museum, in a trapezoidal self-contained space and consisted of 7 "black" canvases completed in 1964.  Since I had never seen Rothko's black paintings before, I wanted to find out for myself which team he belonged to: Maria Vlasovna's, or that of the Cheaters'.  It especially mattered to me since he, like I, was born in Latvia; and my national pride was on the line.   

My investigation produced unexpected results.  How else would you qualify my discovery that his black canvases were ..ahemm.. alive.  Before you think I am crazy, let me explain.  I was sitting peacefully on one of the benches in the nearly empty gallery, facing Nr. 5, a 2m x 2m 'black' canvas (the same one that these two women on the photograph below are facing), and staring at it intently for a while.  The presence of colors was evident.  They came in endless variations of tone, density, with fields of them leaking, dripping, floating and glossing over and peaking out from under one another.  There were reds and purples (which in themselves contain reds), blues and greens (which contain blues), and there were browns (which contain reds and blues), and so on.  Maria Vlasovna would have indeed triumphed!


Then something strange happened. As I was lowering my glance, still on Nr.5, a slightly brighter spot in the top part of the painting slid right behind one of the dark layers of paint below it.  I instinctively looked right up, and there it was, this spot, back where it was a second ago.  I repeated my move, experimenting with it again and again, and the same thing happened over and over again.  Rothko's spot was playing peek-a-boo with me!   For a moment there, in a particularly ambitious fit, I thought perhaps Rothko is trying to communicate something to me?!  But I quickly changed my mind, because I wasn't getting the message (it wasn't very clear!).  And to admit later that I was called upon by the late master and failed to respond would be too embarrassing.  And besides, why me?!  There are many better deserving people out there.  Like Maria Vlasovna.   Or like one of Rothko's students.  Also, this was happening at the National Gallery of Art and not at some Afterlife Anonymous convention.  This was ridiculous.  

To make matters even more peculiar, I started noticing that fields and lines were 'moving' in the other paintings too, a 3D performance of colorful blacks unfolding in front of my confused eyes... 

In retrospect, a couple of things were happening, I think.  Firstly, as I became more immersed in the large canvasses, my mind became calmer and turned inwards.  And in there, files upon files, lye visual images I had acquired in the past that were now somehow becoming alive.  (Was I inadvertently entering a mediative state?  No doubt!)  And secondly, what I had observed in the peek-a-boo spot and the other kinetic oddities were some peculiarities in the way my eyes work, with their lifetime of microscopic injuries, anatomical irregularities, pressure, dust, eyelash patterns (our personal built-in light diffusers), and even the tiny accidental speckles on my eyeglasses!  All of this instigated by Rothko's 'black' canvases.  So, with all this in mind, what else had I seen in my long history of looking that I perceived in a certain way thinking that that's EXACTLY what it looked like, while in fact every one of us would perceive it differently, depending on the peculiarities of our own eyesight, the quality of light, even on the brand of mascara or eyeglasses we are wearing.  Take colors for instance.  Have you ever had to argue with someone about whether something was red or orange?...  Do you see my point? 

For Rothko, painting was a mixture of philosophical and physical activity.  The order of a thought, and disorder of an impulse had to arrive at an agreeable - if not perfect - junction. (paraphrasing Friedrich Nietzsche by whose work Rothko was deeply influenced)  He was very protective of his work space.  Hence, there are no photographs of him painting.  I can only guess how he worked, the deep thinker, the intense feeler and the unwavering hard working artist that he was, and what went through his mind, as he took weeks and months to complete his paintings.  Imagine how much of the weighed, calculated intensity went into each stroke!

Whatever it was that transpired in that brightly lit room, it reinforced my belief that ultimately we each have to do our own work of looking at and interpreting a work of art.  You know how your eyes adapt to the dark if you stay in it for some 60 seconds?  If you give at least that much time to one of Rothko's 'black' paintings, for instance, you will start seeing beyond the obvious.  And that's very helpful when you look at something that is not at all known.  Like BLACK! 

I can say for myself, that in this small collection of Mark Rothko's blacks on view in the Tower, I saw Light, and I saw Color.  Both Matisse and Maria Vlasovna would be glad.  


In the Tower: Mark Rothko at the National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C. The show runs until January 2011. 

26
Mar 2010

A Case of 'N', or Between 'Aesthetic' and 'Anesthetic'

These last couple of weeks have been busy, with trips to Washington DC, Boston and New York. 

I am very excited to announce that one of my photographs, Untitled, No.1, from 'Towards the Light' series, was awarded an Honorable Mention at the 9th Annual International Photography Competition at Fraser Gallery in Bethesda, MD.   

I attended an opening reception and awards ceremony on the night of Saturday, March 12th, amidst a rain so hard you'd think it's running for a deadline, floods stopping traffic and communication, and power outages along the east coast - something that made this gathering ever more cozy and jolly, all of us gathered there being among like-minded people, voyeurs and enjoyers of art, critics (let's face it, we all have a vicious critic inside of us!), lovers of human condensation in small places (although that's not me, under usual circumstances..)  

The collection on display, 36 images selected from a pool of about 550 photographs submitted from the US and abroad, was decidedly on the 'beautiful' side of things..  Landscapes, clean abstractions, still life, poems in line and tone variations, some of them paying homage to the old masters (see a recent article on the show in the Washington City Paper talk about this), others experimenting with painting with light in time,  yet all searching for an expression of beauty in their own right.    

With 'beauty' being an underdog in the lexicon of today's art world, it's rather daring to focus an entire show on the aesthetically pleasing.. But Catriona Fraser, the owner of the gallery and the judge of the competition is unapologetic about it.  She's seen enough of urban decay imagery in the last 10 years, it's time to catch a different train.   Besides, who's to say that beauty - in art, or in life for that matter - is a crime?  A voluntary uplifting anesthetic perhaps, for our souls yearning for high altitudes.. After all, an 'N' is all that separates 'aesthetic' from 'anesthetic'!  

 

9th International Photography Competition, opening reception and award ceremony. Fraser Gallery, Bethesda, MD.  March 12, 2010  

Outside view of the Fraser Gallery, Bethesda, MD.  March 13, 2010.  My two photos are right next to the entry  


'Black Widow' by Karl Doyle, one of my favorites in the show. Fraser Gallery, Bethesda, MD.  March 12, 2010  

02
Mar 2010

Fraser Gallery Show

This post, in a shorter version, appeared first as a part of my Feb.27th blog post, 'The Object Stares Back'.  I decided to make a separate entry for it, with more details added.  So, here it is.... 

I have several photography shows coming up this year, and wanted to talk briefly about one of them.  

The show, which is a group photography exhibit of the 29 finalists of the 9th International Photography Competition organized by Fraser Gallery based in Washington DC/Bethesda MD will open on March 12, 2010 at Fraser Gallery in Bethesda MD, and will show two of my architectural photographs. 


Untitled No.1 (Rooflines.  Performing Arts Center at Bard College designed by Frank Gehry.  Annandale-on-Hudson, NY)  2008  

Untitled No.2 (Skylight.  Milwaukee Art Museum designed by Santiago Calatrava.  Milwaukee, WI)  2005

It is an amazing collection of works, and I am truly honored to be part of this show.  You can see the selected works on-line here.  But it's the story behind the gallery itself I wanted to tell you.  

Once upon a time, a young aspiring photographer, born in the UK, and living in the US had a problem on her hands: 26 of her photographs which had just been exhibited in Scotland were "mysteriously" lost in transportation.  After two years of talks with the hosting gallery that led nowhere she decided to go to Scotland and see for herself. What followed was her suing the gallery, upon which all her works emerged intact from a dusty closet, as mysteriously as they had disappeared.  Ignited by her travelogue, the young tenacious artist decided to create her own gallery, where works of art would not get "lost", and which would treat all artists with respect.  Today, 13 or so years later, her inspired creation - Fraser Gallery - is a premier independent photography gallery in the greater Washington area, and a bustling hub of artistic activity.  If you are in Washington/Bethesda this spring, please come and see the show, and perhaps I will see you at the opening on March 12th. And if I am not there, please say hi for me to the owner, Catriona Fraser, the young tenacious artist in my story.  And don't go looking for dusty closets out there!  All the treasures will be on the walls! ;-)    

In the anticipation of the show, I was interviewed by The Gazette reporter Jordan Edwards from Washington D.C. yesterday.  The article, which will also include interviews with three other photographers participating in this show, will run in the Gazette on March 10.  I was curious to know why, out of the 29 artists, he had chosen to interview me.  He explained that he had wanted to focus on photographers from other states, on architectural photography, and on work of a woman photographer.  Obviously, I fit the bill!  But what was interesting to learn was that I was the only woman photographer from outside Washington DC whose work had been selected for the show.  Like architecture, photography still remains a male-dominated field.  Although, I am not a big fan of the word "domination".  How about outweigh?  At least when it comes to weight, we women don't mind to be on the losing side! ;-)  

So, among other things, the reporter asked me how I had arrived at architectural photography, why I took these particular photographs (the ones you see above), why I hadn't chosen photography as my profession to begin with, whether I altered my photographs digitally, and so on. All these questions got me thinking.   But I will leave this for one of my next posts... 

27
Feb 2010

The Object Stares Back

I've come across a notion a few times that taking photographs is hiding behind one's camera. I wonder if that's how it is for others, but for me it doesn't work that way! When I am out taking photographs I feel very present in the moment, and very exposed (no pun intended :). I can pretty successfully blend with the surroundings (unless I am in Southern India!). But as soon as I get my camera ready I am announcing "Here's to looking at you!" And more often than not, there's the look back.

Sometimes I do wish I had one of those spy cameras! One too many times I've come across a situation that pleads to be recorded but I don't dare lifting my 'hideout gadget'. One such situation comes to mind. One very early morning in December of 2007 I walked into a small cafe in Taos, New Mexico, and met point-blank with a dozen or so wild, life-wise eyes staring at me from the assembly of the locals, all the color of sand - all of them - from the rugged boots, to their long worn-out coats, to crazy hair, to wide-brimmed hats that'd seen all kinds of weather.. But their eyes were sky-blue, glowing from this untameable mass of sand, penetrating, and ..eternal.. My hand was burning to pull out my camera. But something made me to just pause for a split second, walk in and past these stern sand people, and to stay put. (Perhaps I didn't want to find myself playing a character in a Western, besides it was way too early for that, at 6:30am! But to tell you the truth, I felt like an intruder..) I have the picture of these unforgettable faces clear in my mind, and it's a picture I never took. 

I've traveled a safe route in photography for a long time, shooting safe objects that were either familiar or that won't stare back: I photographed my family and friends in my teens, architecture in my 20-ies, cities, landscapes and abstract geometries in my 30-ies. And it is only recently that my gaze (and my camera) is turning more towards people. Most of my photographs of people are spontaneous snapshots of strangers I encounter. I find faces fascinating. I like imagining life stories of these people. I inevitably feel a strong affiliation with, and sympathy for everyone I photograph. But there are times when I need to step back, to not be drawn in too far. I sometimes wonder what happened to Diane Arbus, had she crossed an invisible line from which there was no coming back?

I just returned from a 2 week trip to the southern part of Southern India (South South India) For the first time I was asking people to pose for me, perhaps encouraged by their warm nature and smiles. So you will see from the pictures that I took during this trip, some of which I will be posting in small installments here, and on my photography website, www.anitalicis.com, that people were a strong focus for me (and yes, many were looking back!). Although I did take a fair number of abstract compositions, landscapes and even wild animals (I will be posting some of those as well)

An old man on the ocean before sunset. Marina beach. Chennai, India. 2010

Sages convene. Kannyakumari, the southernmost point of the subcontinent. India. 2010

Kavín stares back. Near Coimbatore. India. 2010

Late night's smoke. Madurai. India. 2010 

Filed under  //   architecture   art   Coimbatore   Diane Arbus   Frank Gehry   Fraser Gallery   gallery   India   Kannyakumari   people   photography   Santiago Calatrava   travel  
24
Jan 2010

Architecture meets Art and Science

1. DESIGN FOR THE MASSES  Tomorrow is the last day of the Bauhaus exhibit at MOMA.  This is the first major show on the famous art and design school at MOMA since 1938. 

(The slideshow on this website has some beautiful visuals, don't miss it)  This show follows the inspiring 'Bauhaus Modern', the exhibition at Smith College Museum of Art in Northampton, MA held in the fall of 2008 and guest curated by Dr.Karen Koehler, Five College professor of art and architectural history.  


Color Study: Squares with Concentric Rings,1913
Wassily Kandinski
Image source: creativecommons.org 

2. ARCHITECTURE WITHOUT WALLS.  If you happen to be in Vienna this winter, don't miss the 'Transitory Objects' at Thyssen-Bornemisza Art Contemporary museum

Here's a related article in Seed Magazine
I was particularly drawn to Neri Oxman's organic self-supporting architectural skins.  This young and extremely talented designer from Israel works with rapid prototyping technology, and in her research combines biomimicking with the design and construction of built environment.  This may as well be the language of our not-so-distant future architecture.   
Pompidou Center in Paris currently features Alisa Andrasek, one of 'Transitory Objects's' participant's project 'Biothing'

Speaking of Pompidou, the Center as always has an array of amazing shows.  Among them, a vast display of women artists at 'elles@certrepompidou', a first show of its kind, where a museum showcases the feminine side of its permanent collection. Around 200 women artists are represented from 20th century to the present day.  

And a couple of other shows at the museum I want to mention, one of them still up and running. 

3. EYEBALL RE-CUT  Exposition on Surrealism in film and photography - 'La Subversion des images-Surréalisme, photographie, film' - this exposition just closed, but the evocative video collage intro is well worth watching

4. THE PAINTER OF BLACK AND LIGHT Currently showing at Centre Pompidou: Soulages: Black on black (and not-so-black) 
Reminds me of Louise Nevelson's 'Queen of the Black Black' period.  Although, while Nevelson went through a number of creative phases, her inspiration and expression growing from color to white, from black to gold, Soulage has always been the 'king of the black black'. 

Louise Nevelson, Cityscape, 1979 
Image source: creativecommons.org 

Pierre Soulages, Peinture 324 x 362 cm, 1985 Polyptyque C 
Collection Centre Pompidou, Musée national d’art moderne
Image source: creativecommons.org 

16
Jan 2010

The Return of 'The Americans'

Two weeks ago I went to New York City to see Looking In: Robert Frank's 'The Americans'* photography show at the Metropolitan Museum or Art.
The show was organized by the National Art Gallery in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the first American publication of the book 'The Americans'. 

The collection of 83 photographs grew out of Robert Frank's cross-country travel on the Guggenheim Memorial fellowship in 1955-56.  Frank, a young Swiss photographer, had come to the states a few years prior to that.  This cross-country trip was to change his life forever, and also alter the way that street photography was done and viewed in the United States. Frank took about 27,000 candid photographs during the trip, shot on the streets, at bars, malls, factories... He eventually narrowed them down to 83, all of which were part of the show.  There were also scores of marked contact sheets, work prints, letters, and work not included in 'The Americans' - an amazing display of Frank's work process!  I could have spent days, not hours there.. It felt like being in the middle of an archaeological dig.  A dig that is also very contemporary and very much alive.  

The Americans didn't take "The Americans" very kindly when the collection first saw the light in 1958.  It was harshly criticized, both by the public, and the art critics, and even by other photographers, not just for its subject matter but also for the quality of the photographs (the "blur", and the "grain", which went against ..the grain of the contemporary style), and was refused showing by such reputable museums as MOMA.  It took almost 5 decades (!) to bring the show to New York City.   
And boy, is it worth seeing!  I caught it only a day before it closed, on the first weekend of January.  It took my breath away (and not because I was literally sandwiched in among thousands of other visitors!)!  I wasn't familiar with most of the work I saw there beforehand.  (I had never, until then, seen the book)  The work was fresh, blunt, honest, poignant.  Robert Frank captures moments in-between (the events), moments between the "decisive moments" (Cartier-Bresson).  His pictures don't freeze time.  They make it last.  If you look at his images long enough you start seeing the movement, the thought.  Black and white, they are actually full of color.  Often static, they convey motion and life.  Stay long enough with his photograph, and you will hear the rhythm of your own heart beat.  A show like this warrants multiple viewings.  I only hope I don't have to wait 50 years for the next opportunity! 

The day I was there, the museum was overflowing with people, Americans and foreigners alike... It seemed that the entire population had con-densed itself in, to catch the last glimpse of this once sidelined and controversial show.  There was no room, between shoulders of the strangers, not even between the onlookers and the photographs themselves.  What a contrast then, with some of the photographs, often featuring a single figure, or a face, or void of people altogether. 

US 285, New Mexico, 1955. Photograph © Robert Frank

MET-MADness - a couple of shots of the holiday crowd in the lobby of the museum.  Saturday, January 2nd 2010

My impressions from the exhibit spilled out of the museum and haunted me as I was walking down the frozen and suddenly vacant streets of Manhattan later in the day.  And they also followed me underground... 

A girl on a subway.. 
Some of the balloons, long and twisted in shape, resembled huge floating ventilation ducts threatening to burst out of the train car.  The whole scene was reminiscent of a bizarre phantasmagoric film set, a surreal mixture between 'Brazil' and 'Bladerunner'.  
Not surprising then, that mesmerized, my friend who was visiting NYC for the first time, and I got lost in the subway tunnels.  We found ourselves at the World Trade Center station.  Before looking for the way back to our car, we emerged from underground, and watched, from above the immense underground void, dotted with the remains of the buildings and infrastructure at Ground Zero.  It was Saturday night.  But the gigantic pit, its tall punctured walls resembling ancient Roman ruins in their monumentality and stillness, was nevertheless rambling, growling and trembling: the National September 11 Memorial & Museum are under construction. 

An abandoned broken umbrella flying around in a dance with the wind brings back the sense of scale, and returns me to reality.. 
...The fleeting sense of which is then winked at by a glowing apparition, through a tall storefront window, of a seductively orange Lamborghini!  It is perfect in its smoothness and shine, but eery and unreal with its caged-in stillness and out-of-reachedness, but mostly for the contrast it slips in, with my earlier impressions.

16
Jan 2010

Elevator-Time Machine?

Robert Frank, 
Elevator—Miami Beach, 1955; gelatin silver print; 12 3/8 × 18 13/16 in.; Collection Philadelphia Museum of Art, purchased with funds contributed by Dorothy Norman, 1969; © Robert Frank

As I was reading about the photographer Robert Frank, I came across this article that tells a remarkable story about the girl in Frank's famous photograph 'Elevator - Miami Beach, 1955'.  Jack Kerouac wrote of this girl in his introduction to 'The Americans': "That little ole lonely elevator girl looking up sighing in an elevator full of blurred demons, what's her name & address?". 

Photographers don't write down the names of all the people they photograph, so Kerouac did never find out her name.  He would have now though, 50 years later...

Filed under  //   art   jack kerouac   photography  
03
Jan 2010

Shedding Light in Amherst - Part 2

A few days before Christmas my friend Erika Zekos invited me to come along for a plane ride to fly over and take photographs of her illuminated barn project in North Amherst.  I jumped at the opportunity, it sounded like the kind of adventure I love!  Flying in a tiny 4-seat Piper Warrior plane at night, two days shy of winter solstice, with freezing temperatures and harsh winds toying with the elasticity of our comfort zone boundaries, I was taking photographs, sticking my camera out of the tiny window, praying that I don't drop it out into the snowy fields under, or worse even, onto somebody's head!  I hang on to it tight.  Our plane careened 60 degrees to one side to get us a better view. Amusingly, I didn't realize what was happening until our pilot, John Smith, demonstrated the trick to us later, after landing - I was so absorbed in trying to get a focused picture (it proved to be a real challenge!) 
What a beautiful vision it was, like some mysterious night bride, lost in the vast dark of the winter night..  An unforgettable way to welcome the winter solstice! 

Thank you, Erika and John for the amazing experience!  


         

Filed under  //   aerial photography   amherst   art   photography   tobacco barns