anita līcis-ribak’s blog

architecture art photography music culture travel

25
May 2010

A hat, a salad, and a scandal

I've always looked up to my older women friends for clues as to what to expect later in life.  And here I have it:  I am discovering that women seem to have this uncanny ability to have more fun, as they get older.  I am all for it, especially considering how late the word "fun" entered my vocabulary, since there's no analogue in either the Latvian or the Russian languages.  There are of course words for joy, and for happiness, but nothing quite with such surprising - and healthy - dose of lightness and frivolity that the English "fun" would imply.  

The French say that a woman can make three things out of nothing: a hat, a salad, and a scandal.  Let me add something to this list of miracle products: a party!  A woman can make a party any-where, any-time, from any-thing.  And she only gets better at it.    

Here are a few pictures* I took recently at a friend's house where old friends gather once in a while for a night of girls-only party, to kick back, let their hair down (or wear someone else's), and to teach all those who are new to the concept of "fun" just what it means, to have it.  And they've surely got it!  

*I entered this series of pictures in the inaugural CURRENTS exhibit on Women, Age and Sex, called "At Her Age", curated by Martha Wilson.  The exhibit will take place in A.I.R.'s Gallery I space from December 1, 2010 through January 2, 2011.  I should know sometime in the summer whether my submission has made the cut.   


Out of Her Shoes © 2010 

Foot in the Kitchen © 2010 

The Unbareable Lightness of Being © 2010 

Downward Glance © 2010 

 

Filed under  //   A.I.R. Gallery   photography   women  
19
May 2010

Memento Vita, or 30 Days in Spring

For years, Agus, my husband, has insisted that April is the cruelest month. And for years, I disagreed. Until this year came around...

We were in the emergency room, Agus urinating blood and having the worst pain of his life, in his back. A CT scan was performed to confirm kidney stones in action. It also revealed a far more menacing reality: a large mass in his right kidney.

The verdict came brutal and head-on: renal cell carcinoma, or kidney cancer. That day also happened to be the beginning of our infertility treatment cycle, the first day towards a huge hope of having another child. I had just taken my first pill...

I HEAR THE BREAKS SCREECHING.

FULL STOP.

SILENCE.

Agus and I search for each other's eyes... What do you say in those moments? Will he live? How long do we have?........

Minutes, hours, days, weeks of agony, hope, pain, contemplation, procedures, procedures, procedures follow... Some 30 plus days have passed now. The longest days of our lives. Agus has had a successful surgery, and he is on his way to recovery. His tumor, albeit large, mercifully hadn't spread anywhere else, and Agus is now cancer-free! Free to go. Free to live.

I've always remembered to Memento Mori. But these days, all I want to do is, to Memento Vita. Remember Life. Think: LIFE.

So, my dear Agus, yes, April IS the cruelest month. But please allow me to -still- disagree: it has kept you with us.So thank you, April, thank you our dear family, thank you all the compassionate nurses and extraordinary doctors, thank you our many many wonderful friends, and thank you LIFE!

 

***
What follows is a short photo-essay, 30 Days in Spring, which I submitted for the first annual photography portfolio competition organized by the Women's Committee of the Philadelphia Museum of Art

 

***
In the depths of our hearts we are together,

in the cane field of the heart we cross through

a summer of tigers,

watching over a meter of cold flesh,

watching over a bouquet of inaccessible skin,

with our mouths sniffing sweat and green veins

 we find ourselves in the moist shadow that drops kisses

(From Furies and sorrows by Pablo Neruda)


On April 14th 2010 my husband Agustin was diagnosed with kidney cancer.

This series of photographs follows him for 30 days following that day, from the quiet and profound moments of contemplation, through the various diagnostic procedures, his admission to the hospital and the surgery to remove the affected kidney, and to the beginning of his path to recovery.

I have kept my camera at hand, night and day, as if it could protect me, and him, from the inevitable. Taking photographs of my ill husband became my way of recording - and taming - my own agonies and doubts, and recognizing the signs of hope, and the presence of joy.

There were complications after the surgery, and Agustin needed blood transfusions. One day, while waiting for the donors’ blood too arrive, I wandered outdoors, and into a nearby park. It was bursting in its spring attire, life flowing through the veins of the tree branches, feeding colors and shapes into spectacular bloom. There were shapes that were most fragile in their gestures, and there were textures and volumes that spoke of longevity and of indomitable strength.

I was thinking of my husband, as I was walking through this awe-inspiring life factory, and of the frailty of his struggling body, the resilience of his tired mind, and the fervor of his spirit.

Back in my husband’s hospital room, the time seems to stop. There are no seasons. No colors. No sounds. We are - he and I - hermetically sealed into a time capsule, where the only way of being is waiting. And hoping.

He had chosen to struggle quietly, without the arsenals of bravura and drama. He has inspired me through all these days, and keeps on doing so, with his beauty, doing things his own way, full of life, both like a gentle blossom, and a rigid trunk of a worldly mature tree.

Filed under  //   'People' series   Agus   kidney cancer   Philadelphia Museum of Art   photography  
14
Apr 2010

Making men (and women) of our dreams

Remarkable work from a young Russian photographer Alexander Gronsky!  I love his series of photographs of cities and people at dusk from the borderlines of civilization, such as Endless Night and Chukotka Travel, both under Editorial, and his ephemeral Edges series, found under Artwork.  But the collection that struck me most was Town of Brides (Editorial).  

 
"With 1298 women for every 1000 men Novgorod is now officially called "Town of Brides".  For this project women seeking marriage were asked to produce with help of police software portrait (sic) of a man of their dreams" - says Gronsky in his intro to the series.    
 
Photographs of Novgorod women are coupled with the engineered portraits of their dream men.  Women, all of them good looking, are shown in what appears to be their natural surroundings.  There are no theatrics, no drama.  But you sense a quietly felt static of unsatisfied yearning.  What struck me most were the composite physiognomies of their imaginary men.   All of them were nothing short of highly undesirable, to me (since I had to go through this exercise of looking and 'evaluating' them as dream material).  These would be the men I would caution my daughter against (if I had one).  But then, I don't live in Novgorod.  Is it desperation felt by these women, coupled with their low self-esteem, that we see at work here?  Is it our tendency to repeat our history, even if it is a violent and demoralizing one?  I say this because I am well aware of the difficulties these women may be facing, being exposed to domestic violence, alcoholism, harassment, lack of opportunities, apathy, and loneliness, all byproducts of a broken empire, and of a loaded - and very immediate - history.  What a poignant - and timely - portrait of imaginary anti-couples, by Alexander Gronsky!  
 
An old Latvian adage says "Neskaties vīru pēc cepures", which loosely translates as "don't choose a man from his hat (meaning his looks)".  Other cultures encourage women to give a man's shoes an inspecting gaze, to see how well upkept they are, as an indicator of just how good a husband he would make.  In yet other places, you are advised to get drunk with your sweetheart, to have a sneak peak into his true nature, before you commit to nuptials.  None of the men in the drawings has a hat, but they all have a distinctly unsettling look!  I think I would skip the hat, ignore the shoes, and run away from any co-drinking offers altogether! 
Alexander Gronsky.  Town of Brides series.  2010
 
A different kind of couple, living on the opposite side of the globe, is presented in the London-based photographer Zed Nelson's brilliant and disturbingly acute series Love Me.  A man, a modern-day Pygmalion in full control of his fate, proud of his workmanship, with a woman of his dreams - and a fruit of his labor - by his side.  She is his Galatea, his creation, and his sunbathed version of Botticelli's Venus, his Muse -  all in one. 
Zed Nelson.  Ox and Angela, plastic surgeon and wife. 2010
Rio, Brazil.
 
Two couples.  One imaginary.  Another one real.  Both products of fear, imagination, vanity and longing.  Both joined by their surreal premise, and an uncertain future.  
  
File:Botticelli Venus.jpg
Sandro Botticelli.  The Birth of Venus.  1486
Image source: commons/wikimedia.org
Jean Léon Gerôme.  Pygmalion and Galatea.  1865-70. 
Image source: www.victorianweb.org

13
Apr 2010

About hands - 1

Yesterday I resumed my flamenco dance practice.  It's been a few years without, that started with a broken toe, and extended into a prolonged time off.  I started studying flamenco in '98, with Inés Arrubla, the first dancer to offer flamenco classes in the Pioneer Valley in Western Massachusetts.  I jumped at the opportunity as soon as she opened the door of her studio.  I guess my passion for flamenco comes first from the guitar sounds.  And since I figured I can never learn to play a decent flamenco on the guitar, I can at least try to express it with my body.  It has been a wonderful journey.  It took some years, not months, without exaggeration, just to get to a point where my body started accepting the flamenco form: head raised high up above the shoulders; shoulders down, chest up and forward, like a bull's horns, elbows having a life of their own, almost always away from the body, feet that work as a percussion, and so on... The hands, in all their myriad of expressions, are by far the most difficult to master.  I am still working on it...   

So, I want to talk about hands... 
 
Hands say so much.  And hands never lie.  You can change your face, stretch it fold-less, you can tuck in your belly, your can wear a wig, or a glass eye, you can reduce the size of your toes (no kidding!), but you can't do much with your hands.  See Zed Nelson's Love Me Nr.16 for a proof.  And how ironic that the subtitle says "Age undisclosed" while in fact, Sally's hands tell her age, loud and clear.  I watch my own hands change with age.  And I know they are telling the truth. 
 
In flamenco, the hand becomes like a flower.  It opens and closes, it breathes along with the dance.  You can do an entire dance with your hand alone, without ever getting up from a chair.  One of the most beautiful things about flamenco is that you don't have to be 16, or even 35 to look great when you dance.  In fact, I believe, the flamenco dancer becomes ever more noble, and more expressive with age.  It's the scarsity of movement, its carefully chosen expressions that become loaded with emotion and meaning.  Because you, the onlooker, are hungry for it.  And because you know that the dancer has a lot to say.  She has lived a life.  
 
Like my mother.  No, she doesn't dance flamenco.  For her, dancing flamenco would be an unimaginable luxury.  She has lived all her life, humbly and simply, finding fulfillment in serving others.  She has suffered like no other in her life.  But always, always found joy in the little things around her.  And she has been contagious with that skill.  
 
So, here are my mother's hands.  The hands that cradled me when I was small.  The hands that would cradle me still.  If I asked...     
The hands that cradled me.  2009.  Rīga, Latvia

Filed under  //   daily series   family   flamenco   Ines Arrubla   photography   Pioneer Valley   Zed Nelson  
10
Apr 2010

Every day, between yesterday and tomorrow - 4

What do you think of, when you think of BLACK? 

New York
depression 
Solange 
caviar
Louise Nevelson 
death
Coco Chanel 
polar night 
Mark Rothko 
computer monitor that won't work
Albert Einstein
black and white photography
Malevich
polar night 
Mr.Bean (as in Black Adder)
what else?......
none of the above? 

How about color?  And what about light??

"I didn't start using pure black paint to show darkness.  I started using it to show light", said Henri Matisse in 1914.

As a teenager studying painting in the Russian Arctic I was taught by my teacher Maria Vlasovna (whose last name has been long betraying my memory) to never ever use BLACK in my work.  We were at the time working on a series of still lives, or 'натюрмортр's.  Russians, for their love of everything French, that goes back centuries, use the French 'nature morte' which literally means still, or frozen nature, or life.  (As if you could freeze life!  Oh, but wait, yes, you can!...)  Our 'frozen lives' were usually artful, if a bit contorted, assemblies of artificial fruits, vases, draperies, architectural fragments and other art paraphernalia that were lit by bare bulbs screaming 'October revolution'.  A sad yellow light was artfully sinisterized by an audio accompaniment in the form of wailing songs of the arctic winds outside small frozen windows, 4 panes thick.  While we indulged in our pursuit of mastering the intricacies of high arts, armies of ignorant cockroaches were busy encroaching on the fruits of our labor, stored in the shelves in the corner of the same room.  Always unbeknownst to us, they would feast on the sweeter of the pigments, leaving long nervously irregular lines on the surface of our watercolor paintings.  And they would always be gone (to an afterparty elsewhere, perhaps?), before we could ever get to them.  If you think you are seeing pure black, which you are not, use other colors to make it, was one of Maria Vlasovna's mantras.  Maybe that's why each class was 3 hours long.  Try concocting your own black!  

Years later I found out that while my classmates and I were struggling, sheepishly inventing our BLACKS, other, much shrewder - and real - painters in other parts of the world, would just go right ahead and use the black right out of their tubes.  (I don't know about Malevich, but think of Solange, and of Louise Nevelson for instance)  Cheaters, I thought!  But I guess, there's right time, right place - and the right color - for everything! 

On a recent trip to Washington D.C., I had a couple of hours to spare before leaving the city.  So I headed to the National Gallery of Art.  There were two shows there that I wanted to see in particular.  One of them was 'In the Tower: Mark Rothko'.   It was housed above the rest of the museum, in a trapezoidal self-contained space and consisted of 7 "black" canvases completed in 1964.  Since I had never seen Rothko's black paintings before, I wanted to find out for myself which team he belonged to: Maria Vlasovna's, or that of the Cheaters'.  It especially mattered to me since he, like I, was born in Latvia; and my national pride was on the line.   

My investigation produced unexpected results.  How else would you qualify my discovery that his black canvases were ..ahemm.. alive.  Before you think I am crazy, let me explain.  I was sitting peacefully on one of the benches in the nearly empty gallery, facing Nr. 5, a 2m x 2m 'black' canvas (the same one that these two women on the photograph below are facing), and staring at it intently for a while.  The presence of colors was evident.  They came in endless variations of tone, density, with fields of them leaking, dripping, floating and glossing over and peaking out from under one another.  There were reds and purples (which in themselves contain reds), blues and greens (which contain blues), and there were browns (which contain reds and blues), and so on.  Maria Vlasovna would have indeed triumphed!


Then something strange happened. As I was lowering my glance, still on Nr.5, a slightly brighter spot in the top part of the painting slid right behind one of the dark layers of paint below it.  I instinctively looked right up, and there it was, this spot, back where it was a second ago.  I repeated my move, experimenting with it again and again, and the same thing happened over and over again.  Rothko's spot was playing peek-a-boo with me!   For a moment there, in a particularly ambitious fit, I thought perhaps Rothko is trying to communicate something to me?!  But I quickly changed my mind, because I wasn't getting the message (it wasn't very clear!).  And to admit later that I was called upon by the late master and failed to respond would be too embarrassing.  And besides, why me?!  There are many better deserving people out there.  Like Maria Vlasovna.   Or like one of Rothko's students.  Also, this was happening at the National Gallery of Art and not at some Afterlife Anonymous convention.  This was ridiculous.  

To make matters even more peculiar, I started noticing that fields and lines were 'moving' in the other paintings too, a 3D performance of colorful blacks unfolding in front of my confused eyes... 

In retrospect, a couple of things were happening, I think.  Firstly, as I became more immersed in the large canvasses, my mind became calmer and turned inwards.  And in there, files upon files, lye visual images I had acquired in the past that were now somehow becoming alive.  (Was I inadvertently entering a mediative state?  No doubt!)  And secondly, what I had observed in the peek-a-boo spot and the other kinetic oddities were some peculiarities in the way my eyes work, with their lifetime of microscopic injuries, anatomical irregularities, pressure, dust, eyelash patterns (our personal built-in light diffusers), and even the tiny accidental speckles on my eyeglasses!  All of this instigated by Rothko's 'black' canvases.  So, with all this in mind, what else had I seen in my long history of looking that I perceived in a certain way thinking that that's EXACTLY what it looked like, while in fact every one of us would perceive it differently, depending on the peculiarities of our own eyesight, the quality of light, even on the brand of mascara or eyeglasses we are wearing.  Take colors for instance.  Have you ever had to argue with someone about whether something was red or orange?...  Do you see my point? 

For Rothko, painting was a mixture of philosophical and physical activity.  The order of a thought, and disorder of an impulse had to arrive at an agreeable - if not perfect - junction. (paraphrasing Friedrich Nietzsche by whose work Rothko was deeply influenced)  He was very protective of his work space.  Hence, there are no photographs of him painting.  I can only guess how he worked, the deep thinker, the intense feeler and the unwavering hard working artist that he was, and what went through his mind, as he took weeks and months to complete his paintings.  Imagine how much of the weighed, calculated intensity went into each stroke!

Whatever it was that transpired in that brightly lit room, it reinforced my belief that ultimately we each have to do our own work of looking at and interpreting a work of art.  You know how your eyes adapt to the dark if you stay in it for some 60 seconds?  If you give at least that much time to one of Rothko's 'black' paintings, for instance, you will start seeing beyond the obvious.  And that's very helpful when you look at something that is not at all known.  Like BLACK! 

I can say for myself, that in this small collection of Mark Rothko's blacks on view in the Tower, I saw Light, and I saw Color.  Both Matisse and Maria Vlasovna would be glad.  


In the Tower: Mark Rothko at the National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C. The show runs until January 2011. 

06
Apr 2010

Every day, between yesterday and tomorrow - 2

I took this photograph peering through one of the tunnel-like openings formed by the massive stone walls in the base of "The Liberty statue of India", a 133 feet (40.5 m) tall stone sculpture of the Tamil saint and poet Tiruvalluvar, author of the Thirukkural. (Thirukkural, a classic of couplets, or aphorisms, is considered to be the first work to focus on ethics in Dravidian Literature). The sculpture was completed in 2000 and is located atop a small island near the town of Kanyakumari, which lies on the southernmost tip of the The Indian Peninsula, where three bodies of water, the Bay of Bengal, the Indian Ocean, and the Arabian Sea meet.

On my trip through Tamil Nadu in Southeast India in February I met and talked to several people whose lives are intrinsically tied to the ocean, and who told me their personal accounts of the terrible morning in December of 2004, the day of the most infamous tsunami. One was a young fisherman who by night sells beautiful sea shells on Chennai beach. He and his friend were preparing to go out to the sea in their small wooden boat that morning. They were spared, but the mother of his friend was killed by the wave. Another one, an old man, was doing his usual chores at the Gandhi Memorial in Kanyakumari, preparing the museum for the opening, when the tsunami hit. Everything inside the museum was destroyed, he told me, all the photographs were washed away, windows shattered, but he, save for the vision in one of his eyes, was spared. The wave was so enormous, he told me, that it touched the shoulder of Tiruvalluvar's statue. I looked back at the statue from where he and I were standing. It was dwarfing the tiny figures of people gathered at its feet. And I would have thought that this man is a reincarnation of baron Munchausen. Except that I was full well aware of the extensive damage that this tsunami had produced in the region, and seen areas still desolate of life, 6 years after. So I stood there, stretching my imagination around this new information like some Glad Cling Plastic Wrap over an elephant, and feeling increasingly queazy.

I look at this photograph, and the calmness and peace of the three oceans are astonishing if not reassuring, in the perspective of things. As if it was tamed and composed by the dark square of the dense stone frame, and smoothed out from above by the silver light. A finishing touch - a tiny boat in the distance - was added by a pedantic producer last minute. And voila, we've got ourselves a very agreeable picture. As if there never was a wave that touched the poet's shoulder...

Filed under  //   daily series   Gandhi Memorial   India   Kanyakumari   photography   Tiruvalluvar   travel  
05
Apr 2010

Every day, between yesterday and tomorrow - 1

Today marks for me an involuntary first anniversary: on this day last year a doctor told me I had Grave's disease, an autoimmune condition that tricks your body into telling your thyroid it has to work harder.  Much harder.  I had never heard of Grave's before.  Needless to say, the name itself wasn't very conducive to inspire optimism.  What's in a name, anyway?  In this case, not exactly a projection of the outcome, specifically speaking, but the name of a hard-working innocent Irish guy who discovered the disease in his patients almost 200 years ago.  I was told that although not curable, its symptoms can be kept in check by way of surgery, radiation or medication.  I chose the latter, not so much because I chickened out fearing the invasiveness of the first two methods, but rather because as always I was optimistic and thought that something cosmic would click in me, and I would get fixed up the easy way.  (I'd had to fight for my life before, although never the easy way, and found that the human body is much stronger and more able to self-heal - given the right conditions and attitude - than I thought it to be.)  One year later, things are looking up, but I am still waiting for that cosmic click to materialize.  The truth is, the cosmos will only cooperate self-indulgently, in a sporadic non-pattern.  So when I wake up in the morning I still never quite know which stripe I'm going to get assigned today! 


All this rambling brings me to what I really wanted to say.  I'm humbled by the way this turn of events has made me downgrade myself, reluctantly, from a seemingly omnipotent humanoid to a mere mortal, ;-) and turn my gaze more towards what really matters: the people I love, the small things in life that make me tick, the big things that bombard my mind out of its comfort zone and that inspire me, and currently - trying to tune in with the FLOW, as the brilliant Michaly Csikszentmihalyi calls the state of optimal human experience. 
  
Today I am starting a new set of daily photographs.  These will be quiet and sometimes abstract meditations on slower moments in life.
   

Weighing on Georgia.  Vanishing Point series.  2009

Filed under  //   daily series   flow   Grave's disease   Mihaly Csikszentmihayi   photography  
04
Apr 2010

Conversations in achromatic tones - 5

Today I am going to cheat.  And why not?  It's been a wonderfully sunny day, and I feel that everything's permitted! ;-) 

So, my today's post is not that achromatic after all.. Not only it has color in it, but I decided to call the photograph what it seems: The Blues.  

It was in 2004 when it was clear that Amherst Cinema theater was going to undergo a major renovation that our office, Kuhn Riddle Architects (where I was working at the time) who were soon to take on the job of the renovations and expansion visited the dilapidated and indeed sad looking building.  I came across this 'scene' in the lobby.  Charley Chaplin just seemed so present - and lost - pondering the mundane intricacies of installing the Instant Shelter...  The shelter took some years to complete.  But now it is home to many wonderful events, projects and a place you can always rely on to show the best that independent cinematography has to offer.  I think, Charley Chaplin would look happier now, in his new not-so-instant shelter, the Amherst Cinema Center.  

The Blues.  Amherst, Massachusetts.  2004

02
Apr 2010

Conversations in achromatic tones - 4

There's not much I can say that this picture is not already saying.  I will just quote one of my favorite passages from Alain de Botton's 'Architecture of Happiness': 
'We owe it to the fields that our houses will not be the inferiors of the virgin land they have replaced.  We owe it to the worms and the trees that the buildings we cover them with will stand as promises of the highest and most intelligent kinds of happiness.' 

Crosses.  Streetscapes Series 
Isla Mujeres, Mexico.  April 2008 

31
Mar 2010

Conversations in achromatic tones - 2

December 30th 2006.  I was (still) on my honeymoon.  

I snapped this photograph (a part of my 'People' series) as I was getting off a vaporetto, a venetian water taxi.  To be completely honest, I don't know if the things that capture my imagination now when I look at this picture, are the same that made me stop and take it back then.   But there it was, a magic moment that lasted but a split second, as I caught a glimpse of a reflection of Venice, and two faces in focus, one looking (perhaps) at me, the other one - in profile - away.  Looking at them now, some years later, I see that they both have something in common: they both look ingrained in this ancient city.  There's something immediate and intense about each of them, while the reflected image of the city is more like a projection of someone's fragmented distant dream of this mysterious beauty, La Serenissima, the city of Venice.          

Venice and Venetians, from the 'People' series.  2006

Filed under  //   'People' series   black and white   daily series   Italy   photography   Venice